Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Save more water goddamn it.


One of the hands down most agreed upon places to have awesome ideas is in the shower. I was thinking about this between my washing and rinsing routines, feeling my muscles relaxing in the hot spray from the shower; why doesn't somebody invent a better shower head? Furthermore, why don't all shower heads come with a switch at the top to pause your shower and not lose that perfect temp you wasted so much water finding? Some shower heads have this, but they're usually the sucky ones that some jerkoff put a watersaver disk into that makes sure your shower is aggravatingly slow. Therefore, I think the best solution to this would be a mist setting on all shower heads. Think of the possibilities: Ten minutes into your shower, you done splashing around and ready to get down to the real business of bathing. Pausing the shower means essentially turning off the water and risking getting cold. Nobody except the indulgently challenged likes being cold in the shower so instead, what if there were a mist option? Hot mist would cascade upon you while you wash your hair, shave yourself, and perform all other tasks necessary to being in a quiet room where for forty damn minutes nobody can bother you.

Somebody should pay me for this shit.

Sunday, November 22, 2009

The Shits Just Keep on Coming

The other day, unbeknown to me, I stepped in a huge pile of dog shit. I walked over to the smiling happy couple with their three giant hairy dogs and politely made conversation while I petted the dogs and then made my way home. I live close enough to work to walk and usually the little bit of exercise I get on the way helps me decompress before I get home. Lately I've been spending my walks trying to hatch different plans to motivate myself back into the working world. At present I am a shop girl at a retail store. I wear an apron and have been classically conditioned to greet anyone at the sound of the bell. Most of the day I think about Socrates in his prison cell and at lunch I read Dante's Inferno. It's not so bad as all that, at least I have a job. But in the grand scheme of things, if anyone asked me what I was planning on doing after college I don't think I would have ever planned on responding with a sigh and a contempt filled 'nothing'. I don't think I've even taken a picture since July and I'm beginning to wonder what the hell I'm waiting for. When did it get so difficult to do what I'm supposed to love doing so much it should be compulsive? When was art ever a forceful activity? And when in the fuck did I start putting off writing until the goddamn dishes were done?

I get home, pull off my shoes and turn on the news, it at least makes me feel better to know something. The couch is saggy and comfortable, but after standing for only seven hours I have enough energy to stretch. I move my shoes and put my head in their place so that I can push my legs against the wall and I notice the glaring unmistakable stench of dog shit. My shoes, which are so close to my head that their laces are touching my hair, are covered with dog shit. Both of them.

Shit.

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Waiting for my ship...

Things not to do:

You should probably not be a student in a foreign country unless you are absolutely sure of the facilities and faculties of those in charge. As it stands, I spend half my time either waiting for instruction or facilities, like a computer, or a printer, or some other piece of frustrating, unreliable technology.

I know I'm not the only one. As I'm writing I'm watching my instructor hurry around the room trying to help six different people at once while also trying to clean the only good ink roller, and explaining over and over again how to make solar and lithography plates. He didn't know what he was getting into, signing up for this, and neither did I.

I'd try to come up with someone to blame, but around here if something goes wrong or is inconvenient the general consensus is that it's supposed to be that way.

It's supposed to be that way.

...

Respectful to toward all who prescribe to some sort of organized religion, I am one who leaves very little up to fate. Death sure, even love when it hurts is better left in the capable hands of time. But school supplies?? Fuck no.

Other than that, and a small bout of insecurity driven depression, this has been one of the most provoking experiences I have ever had. Not only am I in another country, sampling all the goodness my meager pocket can manage, I am on the cusp of a new phase in my life. The time I've had here perusing the architecture and eating gelato has given me the opportunity to sort out some very important guidelines that should pull me through the next year or so. At least, that is the hope.

In any case,

Here's to it and to it again. If you don't get to it when you come to it, then you won't get to it. So here's to it, and to it again.

Monday, July 27, 2009

Killing mosquitoes



So I'm trying to be less of a failure. Here is an example of that. I made this in photoshop, tomorrow I'll shoot solar plates and make a print with ink and paper. I like this; photography made out of ink and paper. It speaks to me. Yeah.



Anyway, Italy is hot and one thing I can't do here is sleep. It is currently 1am and my roommates and I are camped out around the dinner table telling stories from behind our computers. Tomorrow I'll get back to it. I should really go to bed, sometime.

The House of the Rising Sun

What have I learned so far...

It's hard to make art without communication +

I am painfully but unabashedly an English speaking American +

I am not an artist without words which means visually, I'm shit =

I am a shitty American artist

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Frottage

N: a technique in the visual arts of obtaining textural effects or images by rubbing lead, chalk, charcoal, etc., over paper laid on a granular or relief-like surface.

AKA, not the middle school version of the definition.

In an effort to get myself back on track with this printmaking gig, I decided to go back to basics and follow my instincts, my mentor would be proud. I've been following this street artist named David Baptist Chirot for a minute now and recently had the pleasure of making his acquaintance in my home-base. He's an interesting sort, you can find his blog here:

Anyway,

he uses several different processes to accomplish his pieces, including making prints using a variety of stamp techniques and rubbings. I dig this low tech method, as I dig all low tech methods and I decided to give it a try.

I chose a variety of infrastructure emblems (they're so cool here!) and juxtaposed them against one another with a little momento mori just to keep perspective.

This is just the original collage, the real deal will be in print later today:


Cheers and beers to the American way, I'm going to visit a cemetery today.

Results to follow...

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

FLORENTINIAN STREET ART

I promised myself I'd get better at this. Good thing I'm more patient than I am active, I guess.

Here I am in lovely Firenze, Italy, spending the month of July (Luglio) getting fat and taking an art class. I'm determined to make the most of it. Somehow I ended up in a photo printmaking class, when I know nothing about printmaking. I can do photo fine, but the facilities here are kind of hard to access and get around and well, I'm just not a printmaker, not in this sense.

Anyway, I'm playing with this printmaking stuff. It's ok on the surface, I just lack the finesse and I can tell the instructor is getting as frustrated with me as I am with this class. I intend to make some darkroom prints, tracing certain elements of those images onto polyplates and making collages. Sounds rad, but so did the last idea I had and that might as well be at the bottom of the River Arno.

Current score is: Printmaking 3, Me 0

Upside of it all is that I'm taking way more pictures and that always makes me happy, even if I can't use them. This city is full of art. Every kind of art. Check this out:



This kind of thing is illegal where I come from (for some reason). Sorry for the blur, one day I'll either be a better or artist, or start selling insurance.

Thursday, May 14, 2009

Engagement with the Real

In Simulations and Simulacra, essayist Jean Baudrillard engages in a discourse in what it means to be part of reality today. He argues that we as a society are in essence experiencing the after effects of reality. He terms this the experience of hyper reality. “It is the generation by models of a real without origin or reality: a hyperreal. The territory no longer precedes the map, nor survives it.” For film 319 I took an in depth look at Steven Spielberg’s 1993 blockbuster, Jurassic Park, and Gordon Douglas’s 1954 film Them and compared these two movie greats in terms of how each presented a disrupted reality and how the directors succeeded in conveying that reality.
In Jurassic Park, genetically engineered dinosaurs escape a specifically designed containment facility during a power outage and additionally are discovered to be breeding outside of the engineer’s knowledge though previously believed to be strictly female; The opening statement itself breaths of a simulation of another reality for several reasons. First of all, humans and dinosaurs obviously would never inhabit the same location, let alone time period, (whether be it over competition for resources or being a food source). These two species were not meant to co-exist.
“The world is changing so fast, and we're all running to catch up. I don't want to jump to any conclusions, but look. Dinosaurs and man... two species separated by 65 million years of evolution, have suddenly been thrown into the mix together. How can we possibly have the slightest idea of what to expect?”
Secondly, the majority of the film takes place on an island in the Caribbean, already removed from general society. The island setting is hyperreal in its essence for being so removed and often inhabiting species not found elsewhere, as is the case in Jurassic Park. Additionally, there’s a storm on the way, and Dennis Nedry happens to be on a mission this night to steal precious embryos from the genetics complex. Both of these factors contribute to the remainder of the film to ‘not of your normal everyday’ variety. Combining these factors results in the charging of a reality or situation that would not otherwise exist.
In reality, people only dig up dinosaurs. Doctors Ellie Sattler and Allen Grant are some such types and they are the bridge between the real world, and the simulated world of Jurassic Park. John Hammond lives on the other side; he inhabits a world where dinosaurs can exist. Doctor Ian Malcolm, on the other hand, is important in pointing out this bridge and the paradox it presents: two realities may not exist at the same time if the factors within them are volatile toward each other. This film further contextualizes simulation in a monster movie context by removing the monsters and bringing society to them. Society becomes part of the hyperreal by consenting to be part of the experiment, i.e.: John Hammond’s control group.
Them on the other hand, introduces society to the hyperreality of its experiments. In this film, giant radio-active ants infiltrate the lower southwestern states causing havoc and with the military down there while everyone involved tries to keep things a hushed up as possible. The ants, said to be abominations of nature, are thought to be the result of nuclear testing that occurred in the area around 1945. Since Them takes place nearly ten years later, the creatures would be the manifestation of mutations in earlier generations of its species. As Dr. Medford Sr. proclaims: “We may be witnessing a Biblical prophecy come true - 'And there shall be destruction and darkness come upon creation and the beasts will reign over the earth.'” Nuclear testing was still a nascent science at this point; these people had no idea what they were dealing with.
In this film, the southwest already brings to mind another reality due to its proximity to Hollywood and the movie industry in general. In Simulations and Simulacra, Baudrillard makes a point of indicating that Anaheim CA, also prescribes to this hyperreal recognition by being the birthplace of Disneyland, the granddaddy of all romantic pastiches. The threat of tampering with nuclear elements was new to the public’s conscious, adding to the sense of altered reality. Fear of this unknown was a key element in this time period and the Cold War was going on ten years, which additionally contributed to the sensitivity the nation conveyed in the film would have to its new monstrous enemy. Finally, the presence of women in male roles is conveyed in this film. At this time in history, many male dominated work places were beginning to take on or recognize women in their fields. This strange new development, in addition to the paranoia many men suffered in response to the perceived threat nuclear sickness posed to their reproductive systems, also contributed to the altered state of this reality.

Society in Them has created the hyperreal by engaging in nuclear testing, a field many people at the time knew nothing about. The public then becomes frightened by the results of this reality and searches desperately for a way back to the way things were. These fears are quelled by the good old fashion victory of American military forces over the dangerous ants.
Both of these films were state of the art in their time with regards to special effects. As Telotte writes in his essay on special effects, the arrival of technology that could effectively bring to life things we had just before only imagined was a milestone for the science fiction film.
“The development of special effects has lately been crucial to the form’s development. Although trick photography and image manipulation have always been central to cinema’s fantastic vision- from Melies editing tricks in A Trip to the Moon (1902), to the stop motion animation of The Lost World (1925) to the computer controlled linkage of models and cameras in Star Wars (1977) to the creation of convincing digital dinosaurs in Jurassic Park, computer generated imagery, CGI, is a relatively recent yet also quickly dominant influence on the science fiction film.” (Telotte pg 252)
Curiously enough, The Lost World is one of the primary inspirations for Spielberg’s Jurassic Park. Them too dealt with special effects and was noted for its large animatronic versions of the monstrous ants.
Baudrillard say that “the real is produced from miniaturized units, from matrices, memory banks, and command models…” Nowhere is this more true to life than in the artifices of film. Designers and model makers on the sets of Them and Jurassic Park created sensational representations of the creature they were desired to make and in doing so, became part of the hyperreal themselves.
“It no longer has to be relational, since it is no longer measured against some ideal or negative instance. It is nothing more than operational. In fact, since it is no longer enveloped by an imaginary, it is no longer real at all. It is hyperreal.” (Baudrillard pg 170)
Spielberg was one of the forerunners of this age to push on digital technology to help blur the lines differentiating reality from its mirror. These images that skate on light and glass are pastiches, variations of our own histories and experiences. Once these creations meet the light they exist in a reality of their own. A reality we engage in most often with the push of a button.

Bibliography:
Simulacra and Simulation, translated by SF Glaser, J Baudrillard - Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994
Telotte, J.P. A Trajectory of the American Science Fiction Film. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. Pages 116-118
Jurassic Park, 1993, Steven Spielberg
Them, 1954, Gordon Douglas

Monday, May 4, 2009

T-minus 11 days

So as graduation is eminent, I thought I'd take a sec or two to get a few images up to signify my presence as an arTEEst in the interweb realm. I am a photographer, I'll graduate with a BFA in film with an emphasis on photography. This means I have a niche in narrative. After I graduate I'll be living in the digital age with no sort of digital camera of any kind. I have a Canon AE-1 from the 80's, an Olympus point and shoot from the 60's, and a Poloroid 600 that I got at Goodwill for $3.00. What a fun adventure this will be!

As this venue is to be a kind of log of my achievements/ failures in the real world, I will not be posting any work from my tender undergrad days here, besides this:


That was fun! The real deal is hanging in the Kunzelmann Esser Lofts Gallery ( 710 W. Historic Mitchell St. hours 11a-4p) until May 30th. This little diddy is one of ten, so check it out if you're curious. If not, have fun with your boring safe life you wanker. Just kidding.

In addition to my photographic explorations I would like to add that when I graduate I will also be recognized as having a second degree in creative writing. All the fun of words without the grammatical restrictions! Ok, not really but in a sense kind of. My portfolio as it is is due this Friday after which I'd be delighted to post a sample of my latest story right here at the waterpark. Until then!

(Brief mandatory disclaimer: this blog thus far and until next Thursday is "officially" the site where I post my science fiction film class blog assignments. After this it will be English and Arts all day all night every time. So for now, you'll just have to put up with my extensive knowledge on Jurassic Park, mmK?)

Friday, April 24, 2009

The Creature in the Computer

When Steven Speilberg began making Jurassic Park in 1990, he had a totally different movie in mind. He envisioned a process called ‘stop and go” motion, known now simply as “stop motion” and cites among his inspirations The Lost World, originally made in 1925 and Jason and the Argonauts, made in 1963. Both of these films employed early forms of stop motion and were thought to be the epitome of special effects in their time. When Speilberg heard Michael Crichton was writing a book about dinosaurs and DNA, he was immediately interested. As he read the book he drew out storyboards, already considering the challenges of animating life-sized dinosaurs in a way that would impress modern day movie goers. Before Jurassic Park in fact, the only evidence of computer manipulated graphics in film where The Abyss (1989), Terminator 2 (1991), and another film of Speilberg’s, (1985). As the movie came to conceptual reality, however, Speilberg learned that to impress modern audiences, he was going to have to turn to technology.

One of the things that first inspired Speilberg the director to make Jurassic Park was one of the very creations Scott Bukatman was talking about in his article, “Zooming In and Out”. Universal Studios is a veritable playground inside a movie set. One of the attractions there features King Kong grabbing at the ride tram in front of a Universal Studios back drop. The animatronics of this life sized, giant ape inspired Speilberg who was then considering animating his dinosaurs by way of stop animation. The 7-ton 30 foot tall Kong creation, conceptualized by Bob Gear was the largest and most complex animatronic figure in existence for many years. At those specs, it is not difficult to understand why Speilberg eventually made the decision he did.
The design team, consisting of Stan Winson, Phil Tippett, Dennis Muren, and Michael Lantieri came up with all sorts of ideas, branching off from life sized animatronics, small clay models and the “animatics” which were essentially 3D storyboards put together by Phil Tippett. The process even involved the expertise of famed paleontologist, Jack Horner, who advised the design team on the realism of their creations. Horner, one of the foremost theorists on how we view dinosaurs had some very pertinent advice to give when it came to creating models to mock real dinosaur behavior. “In one of the scenes, some of the model makers had made the tongue come out, like a lizard or a snake, had that been left in the scene, all the work into making these things bird like would have been gone.”

Until this point, all of the wide shot of the dinosaurs were set to be shot using Phil Tippett’s ‘go motion technique”. But Speilberg wanted to push the envelope just a bit further.
“Phil Tippett had perfected the motion blur, which gave go motion a closer resemblance to real life, but it wasn’t 100 percent. I come home with my kids and go over this stuff again and again and again and they go ‘whoa dad! It’s a real dinosaur’, but I still saw the jerks, there was still something a bit “go motion” about it.”

It was here that Dennis Muren, of Industrial Light and Magic stepped in. His previous projects included T2 and he had limited knowledge of computer animation software. He proposed that Speilberg let him have a go at the animation. Muren, and ILM build a skeletal model of a T Rex and had the model scanned in at Cyberware labs using a revolving laser beam that transfers topographical data into the computer for manipulation. “The T1000 was easy, but the dinos needed skin, dirty spots, yellow teeth, watery eyes, muscle movement ect…” He used three different types of technology: Sock, for the individual pieces, Envelope, to animate beneath the skin, and SoftImage, which provided greater animation control and allow animators to move pieces individually without reanimating.

The result was something audiences hadn’t seen in 60 million years. Not only were people able to re-engage with a species long extinct from the world, but once again people were brought to higher awareness through technology. But it remains with a warning. As the actors in the movie interact with these technological marvels, our fragility is no more present in the scenes in which the actors are fighting for their lives. In a literal sense, technology should never be bigger than we can manage, lest we become extinct ourselves.

Sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Kong_Encounter
http://library.thinkquest.org/3496/zjurassic.html
Jurassic Park DVD “The Making of Jurassic Park”

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Supporting a Monster

Throughout history, science has been represented in different ways to reflect our shifting culture. In the 1950’s there was the communist scare, the fear of radiation sickness and of nuclear warfare. In the 60’s and 70’s there where experimentations with psychedelic drugs that parodied the exploration of transcendental states. And in the 1980’s and 1990’s, the world witnessed the birth of the computer, a hallmark of the science fiction realm come to reality. What else changed? In his 1993 film adaptation of Michael Crichton’s novel, Jurassic Park, Steven Spielberg portrays Doctor Ellie Sattler as a strong, independent woman in a field of men. She is the only woman character we see actively studying the dinosaurs in the park and yet, through most of the film, she is seen by the sides of her male counterparts, offering advice and comfort throughout the power outage crisis. Similarly, in the 1954 film by director Gordon Douglas, Them, portrays its only woman scientist also in a supporting role, surrounded by men who are constantly undervaluing her worth and second guessing her authority. So how does it come to be that in these science fiction ‘monster’ movies, that gender roles play such an important part? In the following essay I will explore how the monstrous mutations depicted in these science fiction films both represent the paradigm shift of scientific thought and address the gender representations in this field.
As Dr. Patricia ‘Pat’ Medford in Them actress Joan Weldon is a regular Rosie Rivet. She is out in the field with the men, conducts analysis along with her father, and is the only scientist bodily able to traverse the dangerous ant tunnels with the other male soldiers. However, as she enters the scene (legs first) we get the sense by the reactions of the men in her company that she is one that will be both underrated and overtly desired. Agent Graham even has trouble addressing her as doctor and Dr. Medford politely has him address her as Pat, the singular, genderless adaptation of her full name. Her authority is constantly undermined and usually the men surrounding her ask her father for permission to let her join in as in the initial chase scene after the soldiers bomb the ant hill in the desert.
At her most feminine, Dr. Medford screams and shields herself from the gigantic ant as it bears down her. This is the only instance we see her need the support of the men. As Cornea points out, in this classic 1950’s model of a family, “At its most basic, the Freudian model of gender acquisition was based upon the bourgeois family and required the presence of both the father and mother…” (page 146) She goes on to describe Them as a model for later science fiction monster films that describe a leading/supporting female paradox.
The ants however are the result of nuclear testing in 1945, tests drawn out, and conducted by men. Without getting heavily into the predominately masculine fear of becoming disengendered by nuclear sickness, Cyndy Hendershot writes in her essay entitled, “The Invaded Body: Paranoia and Radiation Anxiety…” about the famous case of Paul Schreber a man who took it upon himself to write out his paranoiac experiences. Schreber writes about a fear of improvised men taking over the world and forcing him to become the only woman in order to repopulate the earth. This reflects the fear represented in film such as Them that show men in an uncomfortable state with women superiors. As the ants represent the disastrous affectations of male dominated technology, Dr.Patricial Medford stands as a beacon of stalwart intellectualism coming from a previously unacknowledged source.
This is not quite, but close to the scenario presented in Jurassic Park as Dr. Ellie Sattler is once again cast in a supporting role. However, this film takes place in the 90’s, well after the suffrage and equal rights movements of the previous era. Dr. Sattler is well aware that she is in a male dominated field and plays up the role by standing back and letting the competition take its course. Look for instance at the competition between Dr. Grant and Dr. Malcolm for Ellie’s attention. Dr. Sattler is already with Dr. Grant, but Dr. Malcolm holds not reserve about shamelessly flirting with Ellie, who says nothing, right in front of Dr. Grant. I think Ellie’s freedom to indulge in this casual flirtation without fear of retribution is a testament to this era’s independent women. She is also first to point out the nature of the poisonous nature of the prehistoric plants. Still she is nurturing and compassionate and takes care of the men around her. In one scene she is comforting the disgruntled Mr. Hammond as Dr. Grant is still at large with his grandchildren. Mr. Hammond is still defending the majesty of the scientific miracle he has created but Dr. Sattler sees it differently:
“I was overwhelmed by the power of this place; but I made a mistake, too. I didn't have enough respect for that power and it's out now. The only thing that matters now are the people we love: Alan and Lex and Tim. John, they're out there where people are dying.”
This is not the first time she applies a wise feminine rational to a troubling situation. As Dr. Malcolm and Dr. Grant puzzle over the morality of creating something like Jurassic Park when dinosaurs have been intentionally wiped out by the natural progression of things, Dr Malcolm applies: “God creates dinosaurs. God destroys dinosaurs. God creates man. Man destroys God. Man creates dinosaurs…” to which Dr. Sattler rebuts, “Dinosaurs eat man. Woman inherits the earth...” Here, women is wiser, and therefore removed from the brunt of the conflict.
In Jurassic Park, as well as Them the monsters are products of a male and his unrepressed technological desires. The ants are the result of male organized nuclear tests, and the dinosaurs are the product of genetic cloning, a science not specific to men as at this time in history, men no longer dominated the field of science. However, in the lab depicted in Jurassic Park the head technician is a man. As hell breaks loose and mankind is made to pay for his oven indulgence by suffering the wrath of his creations, it is women that come to man’s aide. As history continues this trend is lessened by society’s change in attitude toward women, but nevertheless women still maintain supporting roles in both films.
Sources:
Them, Gordon Douglas, James Whitmore, Edmund Gwenn, Joan Weldon, James Arness 1954 DVD Warner Bros. 1954
Jurassic Park, Steven Spielberg, Same Neil, Laura Dern, Jeff Goldblum, Richard Arrenborough, 1993, Universal Pictures, 1993
Cornea, Christine Science Fiction Cinema New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2007 pages 51 & 149-151
Hendershot, Cyndy. “The Invaded Body: Paranoia and Radiation Anxiety in Invaders from Mars, It Came
from Outer Space, and Invasion of the Body Snatchers.” Extrapolation: A Journal of Science Fiction and
Fantasy. 39.1 (Spring 1998) 26-39. (CR 37-43)

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

The New Age of the Dinosaurs

During the early 90’s, a lot was happening in the world of science and computer technology. 1990 brought us the first user friendly internet browser and the beginning of the Human Genome Project. Therefore, it is understandable that by 1993, the year director Steven Spielberg released his box office smash Jurassic Park, the worlds of science and technology were still working out a few kinks. Originally written by Michael Critchon in 1990, given this historical context, Jurassic Park is an exemplary bit of cinema that preserved its original message which functions as a warning to the unknowing masses about the dangers of tinkering with nascent technology.

Throughout much of the film, scientists and philosophers alike are warning against the abuses of technology without prior experimentation and responsibility. During a dinner scene in which Dr. Grant, Dr. Sattler, Mr. Malcolm, and Mr. Hammond are having an argument about whether or not it is morally responsible to be operating a theme park with million year old attractions, Mr. Malcolm makes an interesting point:

“I'll tell you the problem with the scientific power that you're using here: it didn't require any discipline to attain it. You read what others had done and you took the next step. You didn't earn the knowledge for yourselves, so you don't take any responsibility... for it. You stood on the shoulders of geniuses to accomplish something as fast as you could and before you even knew what you had you patented it and packaged it and slapped it on a plastic lunchbox, and now you're selling it, you want to sell it!”

It seems that part of the problem here is that before Mr. Hammond has taken the time to study the effects of his research, he wants to market it and sell it. He defends himself, proclaiming that this is an amusement park for everyone, however, Dr. Grant again points out that there is no saying what will happen:

“The world is changing so fast, and we're all running to catch up. I don't want to jump to any conclusions, but look. Dinosaurs and man... two species separated by 65 million years of evolution, have suddenly been thrown into the mix together. How can we possibly have the slightest idea of what to expect?”

Also in the 1990’s, there is a big move to ensure the online security of individual browsers. Since the inception of a public friendly internet browser, cryptographers calling themselves ‘cyperpunks’ were desperate to find a way to ensure that data going from one point, could arrive safely on at another point without being loaded down with viruses, or encrypted so that the user it was intended to get to can no longer read it. (Wired pgs 1-3) This rise in demand for public security of an intangible variety is reflected several times in Jurassic Park as Dennis Nedry encrypts his computer so that he can steal the embryos and again when Lexie has to hack into his system to turn the security system back on. This also functions as a nod to the duality of technology being both a good and potentially evil force.

By 1993, little progress had been made by the Human Genome Project (HGP). According to Stanford research by 1993, besides an assortment of experiments on plants, the most successful thing to come to fruition was the development of an oligonucleotide synthesizer, which made sequencing less expensive. (http://med.stanford.edu/sgtc/general/history.html) The first cloned animal doesn’t even come into existence until 1997. So where did this idea come from and how did it come about? Around the same time that the movie came out, a research team in Montana led by Jack Horner found viable DNA inside a Tyrannosaurus Rex femur. Whether or not the DNA was usable was not determined by the publishing date, however, scientists had every reason to believe they could procure a working sample from it. (NY Times pgs 1-2)

While his total filmography indicates an interest in science fiction film (director of Jaws and E.T. prior to ’93 and A.I. and Minority Report after) it is interesting to note, that while Spielberg won three Oscars for Jurassic Park, it was in other 1993 film, Schindler’s List, which took best picture, best director and most of the other Oscars. Not matter, Jurassic Park still won Saturn Awards (that’s coming from the Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy and Horror) for best director, best science fiction film, best special effects (which also got the Oscar) and best writing.

Bibliography:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107290/ production info

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107290/awards award info

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/1.02/ Wired info

Levy, Steven “Crypto Rebels” Wired issue 1.02 May/June 1993 pages 1-14

http://med.stanford.edu/sgtc/general/history.html Stanford Genome Technology

http://www.magicdragon.com/UltimateSF/timeline2000.html a Sci Fi 90's timeline

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000229/#director Spielsberg filmography

http://forums.sciflicks.com/showthread.php?t=7255 Movie vs. book comparison

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0CE7DB173AF932A35754C0A965958260&sec=health&spon=&pagewanted=1 NY Times article

Browne, Malcome “Cells of Dinosaur Apparently Found” New York Times, July 1, 1993, pages 1-2